Skip to main content

Macleay Island vs Meadowvale

Property investment comparison - Macleay Island, QLD 4184 vs Meadowvale, QLD 4670

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Macleay Island wins 0, Meadowvale wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMacleay IslandMeadowvale
Median house price$575K$575K
Median unit price$800K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%5.83%
Gross rental yield (units)3.02%3.80%
1-year house growth+13.9%-
3-year house growth+42.5%-
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population3,193434

Macleay Island vs Meadowvale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $575K in Macleay Island and $575K in Meadowvale.

For units, Macleay Island sits at a median of $800K against $690K in Meadowvale, which makes Meadowvale the more affordable unit market and Macleay Island the pricier one.

On cash flow, Meadowvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.83%, compared with 4.40% in Macleay Island, a gap of 1.43 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Meadowvale and 1.2% in Macleay Island, so landlords in Meadowvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Macleay Island is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,193 against 434, roughly 7 times the size of Meadowvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadowvale for rental income, Meadowvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison