Macleay Island vs The Summit
Property investment comparison - Macleay Island, QLD 4184 vs The Summit, QLD 4377
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Macleay Island wins 1, The Summit wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Macleay Island | The Summit |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $575K | $575K |
| Median unit price | $800K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.40% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.02% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +42.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 2.9% |
| Population | 3,193 | 436 |
Macleay Island vs The Summit: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $575K in Macleay Island and $575K in The Summit.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Macleay Island and 2.9% in The Summit, so landlords in Macleay Island face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Macleay Island is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,193 against 436, roughly 7 times the size of The Summit; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Macleay Island for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Macleay Island, QLD 4184
Open Macleay Island suburb profileRecent sales in Macleay Island
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison