Skip to main content

Macleod vs Wildwood

Property investment comparison - Macleod, VIC 3085 vs Wildwood, VIC 3429

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Macleod wins 4, Wildwood wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMacleodWildwood
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$755K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.75%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)3.83%2.51%
1-year house growth+9.6%-
3-year house growth+6.8%-
Vacancy rate0.6%2.2%
Population9,892244

Macleod vs Wildwood: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Macleod and $1.2M in Wildwood, so Wildwood is the cheaper entry point, with Macleod houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Macleod sits at a median of $755K against $910K in Wildwood, which makes Macleod the more affordable unit market and Wildwood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Macleod leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.75%, compared with 2.45% in Wildwood, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Macleod and 2.2% in Wildwood, so landlords in Macleod face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Macleod is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,892 against 244, roughly 41 times the size of Wildwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Macleod for rental income, Wildwood for a lower purchase price, Macleod for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison