Skip to main content

Maddingley vs Winchelsea

Property investment comparison - Maddingley, VIC 3340 vs Winchelsea, VIC 3241

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maddingley wins 2, Winchelsea wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMaddingleyWinchelsea
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.85%5.28%
1-year house growth+4.3%+2.9%
3-year house growth+1.8%-1.5%
Vacancy rate2.6%0.4%
Population5,4912,456

Maddingley vs Winchelsea: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Maddingley and $650K in Winchelsea.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Maddingley and +2.9% in Winchelsea, so recent momentum favours Maddingley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Maddingley houses are +1.8% and Winchelsea houses -1.5%, so Maddingley has compounded faster than Winchelsea over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Winchelsea and 2.6% in Maddingley, so landlords in Winchelsea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maddingley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,491 against 2,456, roughly 2.2 times the size of Winchelsea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Maddingley for recent price momentum, Winchelsea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison