Skip to main content

Madeley vs Noranda

Property investment comparison - Madeley, WA 6065 vs Noranda, WA 6062

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Madeley wins 3, Noranda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMadeleyNoranda
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$675K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.57%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%4.93%
1-year house growth+17.6%-
3-year house growth+64.2%+70.9%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.8%
Population6,8058,002

Madeley vs Noranda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Madeley and $1.2M in Noranda, so Madeley is the cheaper entry point, with Noranda houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Noranda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.57% in Madeley, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Madeley houses are +64.2% and Noranda houses +70.9%, so Noranda has compounded faster than Madeley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Madeley and 0.8% in Noranda, so landlords in Madeley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Noranda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,002 against 6,805, larger than Madeley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Noranda for rental income, Madeley for a lower purchase price, Madeley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison