Madeley vs Wilson
Property investment comparison - Madeley, WA 6065 vs Wilson, WA 6107
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Madeley wins 2, Wilson wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Madeley | Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.57% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.20% | 6.08% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +64.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| Population | 6,805 | 6,608 |
Madeley vs Wilson: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Madeley and $1.2M in Wilson, so Madeley is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Madeley and 0.9% in Wilson, so landlords in Madeley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Madeley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,805 against 6,608, larger than Wilson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Madeley for a lower purchase price, Madeley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison