Mahomets Flats vs Usher
Property investment comparison - Mahomets Flats, WA 6530 vs Usher, WA 6230
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mahomets Flats wins 1, Usher wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mahomets Flats | Usher |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $630K | $640K |
| Median unit price | - | $370K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.98% | 5.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.64% | 7.87% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.7% |
| Population | 806 | 2,137 |
Mahomets Flats vs Usher: what the numbers say
The median house price is $630K in Mahomets Flats and $640K in Usher, so Mahomets Flats is the cheaper entry point, with Usher houses about 2% dearer.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.98% in Mahomets Flats and 5.00% in Usher, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Usher and 1.1% in Mahomets Flats, so landlords in Usher face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Usher is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,137 against 806, roughly 2.7 times the size of Mahomets Flats; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mahomets Flats for a lower purchase price, Usher for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison