Maldon vs Springfield
Property investment comparison - Maldon, NSW 2571 vs Springfield, NSW 2250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maldon wins 1, Springfield wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Maldon | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $670K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.45% | 3.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 1.95% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Population | 25 | 4,310 |
Maldon vs Springfield: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.0M in Maldon and $1.0M in Springfield, so Springfield is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Maldon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.45%, compared with 3.65% in Springfield, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Springfield and 1.5% in Maldon, so landlords in Springfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Springfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,310 against 25, roughly 172 times the size of Maldon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Maldon for rental income, Springfield for a lower purchase price, Springfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison