Skip to main content

Malua Bay vs Waratah West

Property investment comparison - Malua Bay, NSW 2536 vs Waratah West, NSW 2298

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Malua Bay wins 1, Waratah West wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMalua BayWaratah West
Median house price$955K$955K
Median unit price-$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)3.65%4.30%
1-year house growth+2.4%+10.4%
3-year house growth+9.2%+23.9%
Vacancy rate2.0%2.0%
Population2,0713,142

Malua Bay vs Waratah West: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $955K in Malua Bay and $955K in Waratah West.

On cash flow, Waratah West leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.60% in Malua Bay, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.4% in Malua Bay and +10.4% in Waratah West, so recent momentum favours Waratah West, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Malua Bay houses are +9.2% and Waratah West houses +23.9%, so Waratah West has compounded faster than Malua Bay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.0%.

Waratah West is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,142 against 2,071, larger than Malua Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waratah West for rental income, Waratah West for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison