Skip to main content

Malvern vs Sutherlands Creek

Property investment comparison - Malvern, VIC 3144 vs Sutherlands Creek, VIC 3331

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Malvern wins 2, Sutherlands Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMalvernSutherlands Creek
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$800K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.36%1.11%
Gross rental yield (units)3.70%-
1-year house growth-6.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%0.8%
Population9,929129

Malvern vs Sutherlands Creek: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Malvern and $2.6M in Sutherlands Creek, so Malvern is the cheaper entry point, with Sutherlands Creek houses about 3% dearer.

On cash flow, Malvern leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.36%, compared with 1.11% in Sutherlands Creek, a gap of 1.25 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Sutherlands Creek and 1.4% in Malvern, so landlords in Sutherlands Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Malvern is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,929 against 129, roughly 77 times the size of Sutherlands Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Malvern for rental income, Malvern for a lower purchase price, Sutherlands Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison