Skip to main content

Mambourin vs Myrtleford

Property investment comparison - Mambourin, VIC 3024 vs Myrtleford, VIC 3737

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mambourin wins 0, Myrtleford wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMambourinMyrtleford
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price$555K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.66%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)3.22%-
1-year house growth+4.8%+11.6%
3-year house growth+1.2%+8.0%
Vacancy rate7.8%0.7%
Population3153,285

Mambourin vs Myrtleford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Mambourin and $650K in Myrtleford.

On cash flow, Myrtleford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 3.66% in Mambourin, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.8% in Mambourin and +11.6% in Myrtleford, so recent momentum favours Myrtleford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Mambourin houses are +1.2% and Myrtleford houses +8.0%, so Myrtleford has compounded faster than Mambourin over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Myrtleford and 7.8% in Mambourin, so landlords in Myrtleford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Myrtleford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,285 against 315, roughly 10 times the size of Mambourin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Myrtleford for rental income, Myrtleford for recent price momentum, Myrtleford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison