Skip to main content

Mangerton vs Upper Wilsons Creek

Property investment comparison - Mangerton, NSW 2500 vs Upper Wilsons Creek, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mangerton wins 1, Upper Wilsons Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMangertonUpper Wilsons Creek
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$580K$970K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.94%
1-year house growth+2.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%0.5%
Population2,86279

Mangerton vs Upper Wilsons Creek: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Mangerton and $1.3M in Upper Wilsons Creek.

For units, Mangerton sits at a median of $580K against $970K in Upper Wilsons Creek, which makes Mangerton the more affordable unit market and Upper Wilsons Creek the pricier one.

On cash flow, Upper Wilsons Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.30% in Mangerton, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Upper Wilsons Creek and 0.8% in Mangerton, so landlords in Upper Wilsons Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mangerton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,862 against 79, roughly 36 times the size of Upper Wilsons Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Upper Wilsons Creek for rental income, Upper Wilsons Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison