Skip to main content

Manildra vs Parkes

Property investment comparison - Manildra, NSW 2865 vs Parkes, NSW 2870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manildra wins 2, Parkes wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricManildraParkes
Median house price$490K$480K
Median unit price$525K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.56%4.80%
Gross rental yield (units)3.53%-
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate+7.0%
3-year house growth--2.8%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.7%
Population82211,324

Manildra vs Parkes: what the numbers say

The median house price is $490K in Manildra and $480K in Parkes, so Parkes is the cheaper entry point, with Manildra houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Parkes leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 3.56% in Manildra, a gap of 1.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Manildra (an estimate) and +7.0% in Parkes, so recent momentum favours Manildra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Manildra and 2.7% in Parkes, so landlords in Manildra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,324 against 822, roughly 14 times the size of Manildra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Parkes for rental income, Parkes for a lower purchase price, Manildra for recent price momentum, Manildra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison