Skip to main content

Manildra vs Yenda

Property investment comparison - Manildra, NSW 2865 vs Yenda, NSW 2681

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manildra wins 3, Yenda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricManildraYenda
Median house price$490K$490K
Median unit price$525K$355K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.56%4.67%
Gross rental yield (units)3.53%2.08%
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate+2.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%2.0%
Population8221,564

Manildra vs Yenda: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $490K in Manildra and $490K in Yenda.

For units, Manildra sits at a median of $525K against $355K in Yenda, which makes Yenda the more affordable unit market and Manildra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yenda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 3.56% in Manildra, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Manildra (an estimate) and +2.7% in Yenda (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Manildra, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Manildra and 2.0% in Yenda, so landlords in Manildra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yenda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,564 against 822, larger than Manildra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yenda for rental income, Manildra for recent price momentum, Manildra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison