Manilla vs Nyrang Creek
Property investment comparison - Manilla, NSW 2346 vs Nyrang Creek, NSW 2804
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manilla wins 3, Nyrang Creek wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Manilla | Nyrang Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $450K | $455K |
| Median unit price | $435K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.30% | 4.96% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.99% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +31.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Population | 2,386 | 29 |
Manilla vs Nyrang Creek: what the numbers say
The median house price is $450K in Manilla and $455K in Nyrang Creek, so Manilla is the cheaper entry point, with Nyrang Creek houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Manilla leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.30%, compared with 4.96% in Nyrang Creek, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Manilla and 0.6% in Nyrang Creek, so landlords in Manilla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Manilla is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,386 against 29, roughly 82 times the size of Nyrang Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Manilla for rental income, Manilla for a lower purchase price, Manilla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison