Mannerim vs Middle Park
Property investment comparison - Mannerim, VIC 3222 vs Middle Park, VIC 3206
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mannerim wins 4, Middle Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mannerim | Middle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.9M | $3.1M |
| Median unit price | $625K | $1.0M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.04% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.11% | 3.34% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +23.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 2.1% |
| Population | 108 | 4,000 |
Mannerim vs Middle Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.9M in Mannerim and $3.1M in Middle Park, so Mannerim is the cheaper entry point, with Middle Park houses about 6% dearer.
For units, Mannerim sits at a median of $625K against $1.0M in Middle Park, which makes Mannerim the more affordable unit market and Middle Park the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Mannerim and 2.1% in Middle Park, so landlords in Mannerim face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Middle Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,000 against 108, roughly 37 times the size of Mannerim; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mannerim for a lower purchase price, Mannerim for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison