Mannerim vs Portsea
Property investment comparison - Mannerim, VIC 3222 vs Portsea, VIC 3944
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mannerim wins 3, Portsea wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mannerim | Portsea |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.9M | $2.9M |
| Median unit price | $625K | $995K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 1.82% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.11% | 1.87% |
| 1-year house growth | - | -1.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +7.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 4.2% |
| Population | 108 | 787 |
Mannerim vs Portsea: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.9M in Mannerim and $2.9M in Portsea, so Portsea is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Mannerim sits at a median of $625K against $995K in Portsea, which makes Mannerim the more affordable unit market and Portsea the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Mannerim and 4.2% in Portsea, so landlords in Mannerim face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Portsea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 787 against 108, roughly 7 times the size of Mannerim; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Portsea for a lower purchase price, Mannerim for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison