Manning vs Melville
Property investment comparison - Manning, WA 6152 vs Melville, WA 6156
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manning wins 2, Melville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Manning | Melville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | - | $835K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.87% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.25% |
| 1-year house growth | +19.6% | +15.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +84.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 4,219 | 6,204 |
Manning vs Melville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.6M in Manning and $1.6M in Melville, so Melville is the cheaper entry point, with Manning houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +19.6% in Manning and +15.2% in Melville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Manning, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Manning and 2.1% in Melville, so landlords in Manning face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Melville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,204 against 4,219, larger than Manning; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Melville for a lower purchase price, Manning for recent price momentum, Manning for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison