Skip to main content

Manor Lakes vs Warrnambool

Property investment comparison - Manor Lakes, VIC 3024 vs Warrnambool, VIC 3280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Manor Lakes wins 0, Warrnambool wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricManor LakesWarrnambool
Median house price$655K$655K
Median unit price-$470K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.76%4.87%
Gross rental yield (units)3.98%5.15%
1-year house growth+2.6%estimate+10.9%
3-year house growth-+5.9%
Vacancy rate3.4%0.9%
Population12,67531,308

Manor Lakes vs Warrnambool: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $655K in Manor Lakes and $655K in Warrnambool.

On cash flow, Warrnambool leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.87%, compared with 3.76% in Manor Lakes, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.6% in Manor Lakes (an estimate) and +10.9% in Warrnambool, so recent momentum favours Warrnambool, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Warrnambool and 3.4% in Manor Lakes, so landlords in Warrnambool face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warrnambool is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,308 against 12,675, roughly 2.5 times the size of Manor Lakes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warrnambool for rental income, Warrnambool for recent price momentum, Warrnambool for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison