Skip to main content

Mansfield vs Peregian Springs

Property investment comparison - Mansfield, QLD 4122 vs Peregian Springs, QLD 4573

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mansfield wins 2, Peregian Springs wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMansfieldPeregian Springs
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$815K$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%-
1-year house growth+14.3%+14.4%estimate
3-year house growth+53.4%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.3%
Population8,8519,532

Mansfield vs Peregian Springs: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Mansfield and $1.5M in Peregian Springs, so Peregian Springs is the cheaper entry point, with Mansfield houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Mansfield sits at a median of $815K against $1.0M in Peregian Springs, which makes Mansfield the more affordable unit market and Peregian Springs the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.3% in Mansfield and +14.4% in Peregian Springs (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Peregian Springs, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Mansfield and 1.3% in Peregian Springs, so landlords in Mansfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Peregian Springs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,532 against 8,851, larger than Mansfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Peregian Springs for a lower purchase price, Peregian Springs for recent price momentum, Mansfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison