Marcus Beach vs Portsmith
Property investment comparison - Marcus Beach, QLD 4573 vs Portsmith, QLD 4870
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marcus Beach wins 0, Portsmith wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Marcus Beach | Portsmith |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.3M | $2.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $1.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.47% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.90% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +7.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +16.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.4% | 0.4% |
| Population | 839 | 314 |
Marcus Beach vs Portsmith: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.3M in Marcus Beach and $2.2M in Portsmith, so Portsmith is the cheaper entry point, with Marcus Beach houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Portsmith and 3.4% in Marcus Beach, so landlords in Portsmith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Marcus Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 839 against 314, roughly 2.7 times the size of Portsmith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Portsmith for a lower purchase price, Portsmith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison