Skip to main content

Mardan vs St Helena

Property investment comparison - Mardan, VIC 3953 vs St Helena, VIC 3088

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mardan wins 3, St Helena wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMardanSt Helena
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$640K$895K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.01%3.15%
Gross rental yield (units)3.20%2.99%
1-year house growth--1.1%
3-year house growth-+9.7%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.3%
Population2482,890

Mardan vs St Helena: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Mardan and $1.3M in St Helena.

For units, Mardan sits at a median of $640K against $895K in St Helena, which makes Mardan the more affordable unit market and St Helena the pricier one.

On cash flow, St Helena leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.15%, compared with 2.01% in Mardan, a gap of 1.14 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mardan and 1.3% in St Helena, so landlords in Mardan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Helena is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,890 against 248, roughly 12 times the size of Mardan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: St Helena for rental income, Mardan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison