Skip to main content

Mardan vs Warranwood

Property investment comparison - Mardan, VIC 3953 vs Warranwood, VIC 3134

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mardan wins 2, Warranwood wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMardanWarranwood
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$640K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.01%3.19%
Gross rental yield (units)3.20%3.89%
1-year house growth--2.9%
3-year house growth-+2.6%
Vacancy rate0.6%1.8%
Population2484,820

Mardan vs Warranwood: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Mardan and $1.3M in Warranwood, so Warranwood is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mardan sits at a median of $640K against $820K in Warranwood, which makes Mardan the more affordable unit market and Warranwood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Warranwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.19%, compared with 2.01% in Mardan, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mardan and 1.8% in Warranwood, so landlords in Mardan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warranwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,820 against 248, roughly 19 times the size of Mardan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warranwood for rental income, Warranwood for a lower purchase price, Mardan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison