Skip to main content

Maribyrnong vs Preston

Property investment comparison - Maribyrnong, VIC 3032 vs Preston, VIC 3072

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Maribyrnong wins 3, Preston wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMaribyrnongPreston
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$500K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.07%
Gross rental yield (units)5.62%4.78%
1-year house growth+1.7%+3.5%
3-year house growth+9.5%+6.1%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.2%
Population12,57333,790

Maribyrnong vs Preston: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Maribyrnong and $1.2M in Preston.

For units, Maribyrnong sits at a median of $500K against $625K in Preston, which makes Maribyrnong the more affordable unit market and Preston the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.7% in Maribyrnong and +3.5% in Preston, so recent momentum favours Preston, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Maribyrnong houses are +9.5% and Preston houses +6.1%, so Maribyrnong has compounded faster than Preston over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Preston and 1.4% in Maribyrnong, so landlords in Preston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Preston is the bigger suburb, with a population of 33,790 against 12,573, roughly 2.7 times the size of Maribyrnong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Preston for recent price momentum, Preston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison