Skip to main content

Marino vs Nailsworth

Property investment comparison - Marino, SA 5049 vs Nailsworth, SA 5083

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marino wins 2, Nailsworth wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMarinoNailsworth
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.45%2.44%
Gross rental yield (units)3.91%4.40%
1-year house growth+5.8%estimate+9.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%1.9%
Population2,2772,235

Marino vs Nailsworth: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Marino and $1.4M in Nailsworth, so Nailsworth is the cheaper entry point, with Marino houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.45% in Marino and 2.44% in Nailsworth, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.8% in Marino (an estimate) and +9.2% in Nailsworth (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Nailsworth, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Marino and 1.9% in Nailsworth, so landlords in Marino face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marino is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,277 against 2,235, larger than Nailsworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Nailsworth for a lower purchase price, Nailsworth for recent price momentum, Marino for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison