Marmion vs Subiaco
Property investment comparison - Marmion, WA 6020 vs Subiaco, WA 6008
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marmion wins 0, Subiaco wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Marmion | Subiaco |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.2M | $2.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $815K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.10% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.3% | +21.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +57.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 2,390 | 9,940 |
Marmion vs Subiaco: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.2M in Marmion and $2.2M in Subiaco.
Over the past year house prices moved +18.3% in Marmion and +21.2% in Subiaco (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Subiaco, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.
Subiaco is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,940 against 2,390, roughly 4.2 times the size of Marmion; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Subiaco for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison