Skip to main content

Marong vs Murrabit

Property investment comparison - Marong, VIC 3515 vs Murrabit, VIC 3579

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Marong wins 3, Murrabit wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMarongMurrabit
Median house price$685K$685K
Median unit price$365K$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.17%2.99%
Gross rental yield (units)8.73%2.90%
1-year house growth+10.6%+22.7%
3-year house growth+9.8%-
Vacancy rate1.1%0.6%
Population2,005230

Marong vs Murrabit: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Marong and $685K in Murrabit.

For units, Marong sits at a median of $365K against $395K in Murrabit, which makes Marong the more affordable unit market and Murrabit the pricier one.

On cash flow, Marong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.17%, compared with 2.99% in Murrabit, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Marong and +22.7% in Murrabit, so recent momentum favours Murrabit, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Murrabit and 1.1% in Marong, so landlords in Murrabit face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Marong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,005 against 230, roughly 9 times the size of Murrabit; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Marong for rental income, Murrabit for recent price momentum, Murrabit for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison