Skip to main content

Mascot vs Point Frederick

Property investment comparison - Mascot, NSW 2020 vs Point Frederick, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mascot wins 2, Point Frederick wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMascotPoint Frederick
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$900K$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.95%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.78%-
1-year house growth+5.0%-0.7%estimate
3-year house growth+2.2%-
Vacancy rate2.4%1.3%
Population21,5912,043

Mascot vs Point Frederick: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Mascot and $2.0M in Point Frederick, so Mascot is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Mascot sits at a median of $900K against $740K in Point Frederick, which makes Point Frederick the more affordable unit market and Mascot the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.0% in Mascot and -0.7% in Point Frederick (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Mascot, while Point Frederick went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Point Frederick and 2.4% in Mascot, so landlords in Point Frederick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mascot is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,591 against 2,043, roughly 11 times the size of Point Frederick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mascot for a lower purchase price, Mascot for recent price momentum, Point Frederick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Mascot vs Point Frederick: Suburb Comparison 2026