Skip to main content

Mayfield vs Tanilba Bay

Property investment comparison - Mayfield, NSW 2540 vs Tanilba Bay, NSW 2319

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mayfield wins 2, Tanilba Bay wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMayfieldTanilba Bay
Median house price$820K$815K
Median unit price$625K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.16%4.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.31%3.95%
1-year house growth-15.2%estimate+5.3%
3-year house growth-+9.1%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.3%
Population9,8563,237

Mayfield vs Tanilba Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $820K in Mayfield and $815K in Tanilba Bay, so Tanilba Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Mayfield houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Mayfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.16%, compared with 4.02% in Tanilba Bay, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -15.2% in Mayfield (an estimate) and +5.3% in Tanilba Bay, so recent momentum favours Tanilba Bay, while Mayfield went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Tanilba Bay and 2.4% in Mayfield, so landlords in Tanilba Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mayfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,856 against 3,237, roughly 3.0 times the size of Tanilba Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mayfield for rental income, Tanilba Bay for a lower purchase price, Tanilba Bay for recent price momentum, Tanilba Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison