Skip to main content

McCracken vs Para Vista

Property investment comparison - McCracken, SA 5211 vs Para Vista, SA 5093

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McCracken wins 0, Para Vista wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMcCrackenPara Vista
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$375K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.77%3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)3.68%4.68%
1-year house growth+12.2%estimate+15.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%0.3%
Population2,0763,023

McCracken vs Para Vista: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in McCracken and $850K in Para Vista.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.77% in McCracken and 3.79% in Para Vista, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in McCracken (an estimate) and +15.3% in Para Vista (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Para Vista, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Para Vista and 0.9% in McCracken, so landlords in Para Vista face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Para Vista is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,023 against 2,076, larger than McCracken; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Para Vista for recent price momentum, Para Vista for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison