Skip to main content

McCrae vs Rowville

Property investment comparison - McCrae, VIC 3938 vs Rowville, VIC 3178

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McCrae wins 0, Rowville wins 6. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMcCraeRowville
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$785K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.38%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%4.51%
1-year house growth-7.5%+8.0%
3-year house growth-9.4%+9.5%
Vacancy rate4.4%1.6%
Population3,31133,571

McCrae vs Rowville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in McCrae and $1.2M in Rowville, so Rowville is the cheaper entry point.

For units, McCrae sits at a median of $785K against $760K in Rowville, which makes Rowville the more affordable unit market and McCrae the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -7.5% in McCrae and +8.0% in Rowville, so recent momentum favours Rowville, while McCrae went backwards.

Looking back three years, McCrae houses are -9.4% and Rowville houses +9.5%, so Rowville has compounded faster than McCrae over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Rowville and 4.4% in McCrae, so landlords in Rowville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rowville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 33,571 against 3,311, roughly 10 times the size of McCrae; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rowville for a lower purchase price, Rowville for recent price momentum, Rowville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison