McGraths Hill vs St Marys
Property investment comparison - McGraths Hill, NSW 2756 vs St Marys, NSW 2760
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McGraths Hill wins 2, St Marys wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | McGraths Hill | St Marys |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $715K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.50% | 2.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.13% | 4.02% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.3% | +12.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +16.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Population | 2,537 | 13,256 |
McGraths Hill vs St Marys: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in McGraths Hill and $1.2M in St Marys, so McGraths Hill is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, McGraths Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.55% in St Marys, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in McGraths Hill and +12.8% in St Marys, so recent momentum favours St Marys, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.
St Marys is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,256 against 2,537, roughly 5 times the size of McGraths Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: McGraths Hill for rental income, McGraths Hill for a lower purchase price, St Marys for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison