McKenzie Hill vs Samaria
Property investment comparison - McKenzie Hill, VIC 3451 vs Samaria, VIC 3673
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McKenzie Hill wins 1, Samaria wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | McKenzie Hill | Samaria |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $745K | $740K |
| Median unit price | $510K | $320K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.58% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.63% | 3.14% |
| 1-year house growth | -1.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Population | 775 | 57 |
McKenzie Hill vs Samaria: what the numbers say
The median house price is $745K in McKenzie Hill and $740K in Samaria, so Samaria is the cheaper entry point, with McKenzie Hill houses about 1% dearer.
For units, McKenzie Hill sits at a median of $510K against $320K in Samaria, which makes Samaria the more affordable unit market and McKenzie Hill the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 3.0% in Samaria and 3.5% in McKenzie Hill, so landlords in Samaria face less competition for tenants.
McKenzie Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 775 against 57, roughly 14 times the size of Samaria; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Samaria for a lower purchase price, Samaria for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison