Skip to main content

McKenzie Hill vs Shelford

Property investment comparison - McKenzie Hill, VIC 3451 vs Shelford, VIC 3329

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McKenzie Hill wins 3, Shelford wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMcKenzie HillShelford
Median house price$745K$745K
Median unit price$510K$570K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.58%2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)4.63%-
1-year house growth-1.9%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.5%5.5%
Population775263

McKenzie Hill vs Shelford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $745K in McKenzie Hill and $745K in Shelford.

For units, McKenzie Hill sits at a median of $510K against $570K in Shelford, which makes McKenzie Hill the more affordable unit market and Shelford the pricier one.

On cash flow, McKenzie Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.58%, compared with 2.23% in Shelford, a gap of 1.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 3.5% in McKenzie Hill and 5.5% in Shelford, so landlords in McKenzie Hill face less competition for tenants.

McKenzie Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 775 against 263, roughly 2.9 times the size of Shelford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: McKenzie Hill for rental income, McKenzie Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison