McLoughlins Beach vs Wedderburn
Property investment comparison - McLoughlins Beach, VIC 3874 vs Wedderburn, VIC 3518
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: McLoughlins Beach wins 2, Wedderburn wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | McLoughlins Beach | Wedderburn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $335K | $350K |
| Median unit price | $395K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.98% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.12% | 2.25% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +23.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +16.7% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 3.3% |
| Population | 121 | 951 |
McLoughlins Beach vs Wedderburn: what the numbers say
The median house price is $335K in McLoughlins Beach and $350K in Wedderburn, so McLoughlins Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Wedderburn houses about 4% dearer.
Wedderburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 951 against 121, roughly 8 times the size of McLoughlins Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: McLoughlins Beach for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
McLoughlins Beach, VIC 3874
Open McLoughlins Beach suburb profileRecent sales in McLoughlins Beach
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison