Skip to main content

Meadow Heights vs Teal Point

Property investment comparison - Meadow Heights, VIC 3048 vs Teal Point, VIC 3579

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Meadow Heights wins 1, Teal Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMeadow HeightsTeal Point
Median house price$685K$685K
Median unit price$545K$220K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.05%3.12%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%5.69%
1-year house growth+8.7%-
3-year house growth+21.2%-
Vacancy rate1.4%0.9%
Population14,89054

Meadow Heights vs Teal Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Meadow Heights and $685K in Teal Point.

For units, Meadow Heights sits at a median of $545K against $220K in Teal Point, which makes Teal Point the more affordable unit market and Meadow Heights the pricier one.

On cash flow, Meadow Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.12% in Teal Point, a gap of 0.93 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Teal Point and 1.4% in Meadow Heights, so landlords in Teal Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadow Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,890 against 54, roughly 276 times the size of Teal Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadow Heights for rental income, Teal Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison