Skip to main content

Meadow Heights vs Walkerville North

Property investment comparison - Meadow Heights, VIC 3048 vs Walkerville North, VIC 3956

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Meadow Heights wins 3, Walkerville North wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMeadow HeightsWalkerville North
Median house price$685K$685K
Median unit price$545K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.05%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)4.86%2.17%
1-year house growth+8.7%-
3-year house growth+21.2%-
Vacancy rate1.4%17.9%
Population14,8905

Meadow Heights vs Walkerville North: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Meadow Heights and $685K in Walkerville North.

For units, Meadow Heights sits at a median of $545K against $530K in Walkerville North, which makes Walkerville North the more affordable unit market and Meadow Heights the pricier one.

On cash flow, Meadow Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 3.05% in Walkerville North, a gap of 1.00 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Meadow Heights and 17.9% in Walkerville North, so landlords in Meadow Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadow Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,890 against 5, roughly 2978 times the size of Walkerville North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadow Heights for rental income, Meadow Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison