Skip to main content

Meadows vs Murrawong

Property investment comparison - Meadows, SA 5201 vs Murrawong, SA 5253

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Meadows wins 2, Murrawong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMeadowsMurrawong
Median house price$1M$980K
Median unit price$325K$230K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.66%2.61%
Gross rental yield (units)6.44%-
1-year house growth+13.8%-
3-year house growth+43.0%-
Vacancy rate1.1%1.3%
Population1,71719

Meadows vs Murrawong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1M in Meadows and $980K in Murrawong, so Murrawong is the cheaper entry point, with Meadows houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Meadows sits at a median of $325K against $230K in Murrawong, which makes Murrawong the more affordable unit market and Meadows the pricier one.

On cash flow, Meadows leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.66%, compared with 2.61% in Murrawong, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Meadows and 1.3% in Murrawong, so landlords in Meadows face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,717 against 19, roughly 90 times the size of Murrawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadows for rental income, Murrawong for a lower purchase price, Meadows for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison