Skip to main content

Meadows vs Vista

Property investment comparison - Meadows, SA 5201 vs Vista, SA 5091

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Meadows wins 4, Vista wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMeadowsVista
Median house price$1M$1.0M
Median unit price$325K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.66%3.22%
Gross rental yield (units)6.44%3.31%
1-year house growth+13.8%+13.8%
3-year house growth+43.0%+40.4%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.0%
Population1,7171,035

Meadows vs Vista: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1M in Meadows and $1.0M in Vista, so Meadows is the cheaper entry point, with Vista houses about 3% dearer.

On cash flow, Meadows leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.66%, compared with 3.22% in Vista, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.8% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Meadows houses are +43.0% and Vista houses +40.4%, so Meadows has compounded faster than Vista over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Vista and 1.1% in Meadows, so landlords in Vista face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Meadows is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,717 against 1,035, larger than Vista; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadows for rental income, Meadows for a lower purchase price, Vista for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison