Medina vs Orana
Property investment comparison - Medina, WA 6167 vs Orana, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Medina wins 1, Orana wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Medina | Orana |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $680K | $670K |
| Median unit price | - | $590K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.33% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.49% | 4.77% |
| 1-year house growth | +23.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Population | 2,260 | 2,035 |
Medina vs Orana: what the numbers say
The median house price is $680K in Medina and $670K in Orana, so Orana is the cheaper entry point, with Medina houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Medina and 0.5% in Orana, so landlords in Medina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Medina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,260 against 2,035, larger than Orana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Orana for a lower purchase price, Medina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison