Skip to main content

Medina vs Pinjarra

Property investment comparison - Medina, WA 6167 vs Pinjarra, WA 6208

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Medina wins 5, Pinjarra wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMedinaPinjarra
Median house price$680K$700K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.33%4.26%
Gross rental yield (units)4.49%3.20%
1-year house growth+23.5%estimate+22.6%
3-year house growth-+68.9%
Vacancy rate0.4%2.2%
Population2,2604,914

Medina vs Pinjarra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $680K in Medina and $700K in Pinjarra, so Medina is the cheaper entry point, with Pinjarra houses about 3% dearer.

On cash flow, Medina leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.33%, compared with 4.26% in Pinjarra, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.5% in Medina (an estimate) and +22.6% in Pinjarra, so recent momentum favours Medina, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Medina and 2.2% in Pinjarra, so landlords in Medina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pinjarra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,914 against 2,260, roughly 2.2 times the size of Medina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Medina for rental income, Medina for a lower purchase price, Medina for recent price momentum, Medina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison