Medlow Bath vs Minmi
Property investment comparison - Medlow Bath, NSW 2780 vs Minmi, NSW 2287
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Medlow Bath wins 2, Minmi wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Medlow Bath | Minmi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $965K | $960K |
| Median unit price | $575K | $645K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.52% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.1%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 5.6% |
| Population | 569 | 700 |
Medlow Bath vs Minmi: what the numbers say
The median house price is $965K in Medlow Bath and $960K in Minmi, so Minmi is the cheaper entry point, with Medlow Bath houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Medlow Bath sits at a median of $575K against $645K in Minmi, which makes Medlow Bath the more affordable unit market and Minmi the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Medlow Bath and 5.6% in Minmi, so landlords in Medlow Bath face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Minmi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 700 against 569, larger than Medlow Bath; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Minmi for a lower purchase price, Medlow Bath for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison