Skip to main content

Medowie vs Valley Heights

Property investment comparison - Medowie, NSW 2318 vs Valley Heights, NSW 2777

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Medowie wins 2, Valley Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMedowieValley Heights
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.54%3.63%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.53%
1-year house growth+9.8%estimate+6.1%
3-year house growth-+18.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%2.1%
Population10,8791,188

Medowie vs Valley Heights: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Medowie and $1.1M in Valley Heights.

On cash flow, Valley Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.63%, compared with 3.54% in Medowie, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Medowie (an estimate) and +6.1% in Valley Heights, so recent momentum favours Medowie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Medowie and 2.1% in Valley Heights, so landlords in Medowie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Medowie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,879 against 1,188, roughly 9 times the size of Valley Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Valley Heights for rental income, Medowie for recent price momentum, Medowie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison