Skip to main content

Melonba vs Sawyers Gully

Property investment comparison - Melonba, NSW 2765 vs Sawyers Gully, NSW 2326

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Melonba wins 2, Sawyers Gully wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMelonbaSawyers Gully
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$860K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%2.10%
Gross rental yield (units)3.61%5.10%
1-year house growth+9.8%estimate+7.1%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.0%2.3%
Population1,439542

Melonba vs Sawyers Gully: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Melonba and $1.3M in Sawyers Gully, so Sawyers Gully is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Melonba sits at a median of $860K against $460K in Sawyers Gully, which makes Sawyers Gully the more affordable unit market and Melonba the pricier one.

On cash flow, Melonba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.10% in Sawyers Gully, a gap of 1.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.8% in Melonba (an estimate) and +7.1% in Sawyers Gully, so recent momentum favours Melonba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Sawyers Gully and 6.0% in Melonba, so landlords in Sawyers Gully face less competition for tenants.

Melonba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,439 against 542, roughly 2.7 times the size of Sawyers Gully; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Melonba for rental income, Sawyers Gully for a lower purchase price, Melonba for recent price momentum, Sawyers Gully for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison