Skip to main content

Melville vs White Gum Valley

Property investment comparison - Melville, WA 6156 vs White Gum Valley, WA 6162

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Melville wins 0, White Gum Valley wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMelvilleWhite Gum Valley
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$835K$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.25%4.67%
1-year house growth+15.2%estimate+18.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.1%0.4%
Population6,2043,358

Melville vs White Gum Valley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Melville and $1.6M in White Gum Valley, so White Gum Valley is the cheaper entry point, with Melville houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Melville sits at a median of $835K against $740K in White Gum Valley, which makes White Gum Valley the more affordable unit market and Melville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.2% in Melville (an estimate) and +18.8% in White Gum Valley (an estimate), so recent momentum favours White Gum Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in White Gum Valley and 2.1% in Melville, so landlords in White Gum Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Melville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,204 against 3,358, larger than White Gum Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: White Gum Valley for a lower purchase price, White Gum Valley for recent price momentum, White Gum Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison