Menora vs Orange Grove
Property investment comparison - Menora, WA 6050 vs Orange Grove, WA 6109
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Menora wins 2, Orange Grove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Menora | Orange Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.44% | 1.82% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.95% | 6.17% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +57.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Population | 2,691 | 726 |
Menora vs Orange Grove: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Menora and $2.4M in Orange Grove, so Orange Grove is the cheaper entry point, with Menora houses about 6% dearer.
On cash flow, Menora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.44%, compared with 1.82% in Orange Grove, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Menora and 1.4% in Orange Grove, so landlords in Menora face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Menora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,691 against 726, roughly 3.7 times the size of Orange Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Menora for rental income, Orange Grove for a lower purchase price, Menora for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison