Skip to main content

Menora vs Wattleup

Property investment comparison - Menora, WA 6050 vs Wattleup, WA 6166

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Menora wins 2, Wattleup wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricMenoraWattleup
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price-$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.44%1.92%
Gross rental yield (units)4.95%7.18%
1-year house growth+14.0%+18.2%
3-year house growth+57.8%+56.9%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.6%
Population2,691443

Menora vs Wattleup: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Menora and $2.5M in Wattleup, so Wattleup is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Menora leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.44%, compared with 1.92% in Wattleup, a gap of 0.52 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.0% in Menora and +18.2% in Wattleup, so recent momentum favours Wattleup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Menora houses are +57.8% and Wattleup houses +56.9%, so Menora has compounded faster than Wattleup over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Wattleup and 0.8% in Menora, so landlords in Wattleup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Menora is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,691 against 443, roughly 6 times the size of Wattleup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Menora for rental income, Wattleup for a lower purchase price, Wattleup for recent price momentum, Wattleup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison