Mernda vs Timmering
Property investment comparison - Mernda, VIC 3754 vs Timmering, VIC 3561
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Mernda wins 2, Timmering wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Mernda | Timmering |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750K | $745K |
| Median unit price | $500K | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.81% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.95% | 4.37% |
| 1-year house growth | +4.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| Population | 23,369 | 90 |
Mernda vs Timmering: what the numbers say
The median house price is $750K in Mernda and $745K in Timmering, so Timmering is the cheaper entry point, with Mernda houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Mernda sits at a median of $500K against $360K in Timmering, which makes Timmering the more affordable unit market and Mernda the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Mernda and 2.8% in Timmering, so landlords in Mernda face less competition for tenants.
Mernda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,369 against 90, roughly 260 times the size of Timmering; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Timmering for a lower purchase price, Mernda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison