Merrimac vs Mon Repos
Property investment comparison - Merrimac, QLD 4226 vs Mon Repos, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Merrimac wins 2, Mon Repos wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Merrimac | Mon Repos |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $585K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.03% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.40% | 4.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +43.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.2% |
| Population | 7,212 | 24 |
Merrimac vs Mon Repos: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Merrimac and $1.2M in Mon Repos, so Mon Repos is the cheaper entry point.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Merrimac and 1.2% in Mon Repos, so landlords in Merrimac face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Merrimac is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,212 against 24, roughly 301 times the size of Mon Repos; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mon Repos for a lower purchase price, Merrimac for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison