Merrimac vs Tingalpa
Property investment comparison - Merrimac, QLD 4226 vs Tingalpa, QLD 4173
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Merrimac wins 3, Tingalpa wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Merrimac | Tingalpa |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $815K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.03% | 3.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.40% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9% | +12.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +43.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Population | 7,212 | 8,461 |
Merrimac vs Tingalpa: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Merrimac and $1.2M in Tingalpa, so Merrimac is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Merrimac leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.03%, compared with 3.30% in Tingalpa, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Merrimac and +12.8% in Tingalpa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Merrimac, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.0%.
Tingalpa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,461 against 7,212, larger than Merrimac; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Merrimac for rental income, Merrimac for a lower purchase price, Merrimac for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison